Assessment principles at Diak
At Diak, assessment is based on learning aims, which are specified for the early, middle and final stages of study.
The assessment criteria are based on the stage in question and the intended learning outcomes of the course or module.
Assessment areas include
- Professional competence and information retrieval
- Professional skills, ability to work in expert roles and problem-solving skills
- Team, network and leadership skills
- Societal and ethical competence.
Assessment criteria at Diak
General guidelines for assessment of study achievements you can find in degree regulations.
Guidelines for written assignments
Please find guidelines for written assignments in Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Guide 2.0.
Plagiarism i.e. unauthorised use or copying of someone else’s text without citation is prohibited and will result in a process of a suspected cheating case.
Assessment appeals
If you dissatisfied with the assessment of your coursework, you have the right to make an appeal. The process is defined in Diak’s Degree Regulations, section 23.
The coursework assessment appeal process
- The student requests a review verbally or in writing, e.g. by email, from the assessor within 14 days of the date on which the assessment result was recorded in the transcript.
- The assessor carries out a reassessment of the student’s submission (e.g. an exam or learning assignment). The assessor provides written feedback to the student, including a description of how the assessment criteria were applied and/or other basis for the assessment result (e.g. attainment of the intended learning outcomes).
- The assessor sends the reassessment and reasons to the student within one month of having received the review request.
- If the student is dissatisfied with the decision made on the appeal request, they may appeal it with the Examination Board within 14 days of receiving the decision (Act 932/2014, section 57), that is, within 14 days of having received the results of the reassessment and its reasons. The student sends the appeal request and the necessary appendices to the Examination Board. The student’s appeal request must clearly specify which aspects of the RPL decision they are dissatisfied with.
- The Examination Board reviews the appeal request and notifies the student of its decision.
RPL decision appeals
If you are dissatisfied with a decision on accreditation of prior learning, you have the right to make an appeal. The process is defined in Diak’s Degree Regulations, section 23.
RPL decision appeal process
The Examination Board reviews the appeal request and notifies the student of its decision.
The student requests a review of the RPL decision verbally or in writing within 14 days of having been notified of the decision (Act 932/2014, section 57).
The person who made the RPL decision processes the appeal request and notifies the student of the final decision.
If the student is dissatisfied with the decision made on the appeal request, they may appeal it with the Examination Board within 14 days of receiving the decision (Act 932/2014, section 57). The student sends the appeal request and the necessary appendices to the Examination Board. The student’s appeal request must clearly specify which aspects of the RPL decision they are dissatisfied with.
Thesis assessment appeal
If you are dissatisfied with your thesis assessment, you have the right to make an appeal. The process is defined in Diak’s Degree Regulations, section 23.
Thesis assessment appeal process
The Examination Board reviews the appeal request and notifies the student of its decision.
The student requests a review verbally or in writing, e.g. by email, from the assessor within 14 days of the date on which they received the assessment result.
The reviewer reassesses the thesis, writes a description of how the assessment criteria were applied with justification, and submits the feedback to the student within one month of having received the request.
If the student is not satisfied with the explanation, they must contact the reviewer’s supervisor within 14 days of having received the information to arrange a reassessment. The reassessment is carried out by a lecturer who has not supervised the thesis. The principal lecturer assesses the thesis and writes a statement using the thesis assessment template within one month of having being assigned the reassessment. The reassessment concerns the thesis report or equivalent written component. The reassessment cannot result in a reduced grade.
If the student is dissatisfied with the decision made on the appeal request, they may appeal it with the Examination Board within 14 days of receiving the decision (Act 932/2014, section 57), within 14 days of having received the results of the reassessment and its reasons. The student sends the appeal request and the necessary appendices to the Examination Board. The student’s appeal request must clearly specify which aspects of the RPL decision they are dissatisfied with.
Diak examination board
The examination board and its procedures are described in the Degree Regulations.
The decisions of the examination board are recorded. The record log is a public document. Supporting documents that contain information that is secret under the Act on the Openness of Government Activities are not public documents.
Members of the examination board 1.8.2025–31.7.2027:
- Jari Helminen (chair) (deputy chair Lena Segler-Heikkilä)
- Anu Arola (member) (deputy member Eeva Kylä-Setälä)
- Miia Tarujärvi (student member) (deputy student member Santeri Karttunen
The secretary of the examination board is Heidi Grundström and deputy secretary Sari Tuohinto.
Please send mail addressed to the examination board to tutkintolautakunta@diak.fi.
You can see the meeting schedule below. Changes to the meeting schedule are possible.
If you submit an appeal to or request exemption from the language proficiency requirements from the Examination Board, please note that the process usually takes several weeks. The Examination Board will ask for a statement from the teacher who has assessed or taught you.
Meeting agendas are sent to the members of the Examination Board a week before the meeting.
Meetings in spring 2026
- 8 January 2026, 9am
- 16 January 2026, 2pm
- 3 February 2026, 9am
- 2 March 2026, 9am
- 8 April 2026, 9am
- 29 April 2026, 12noon
- 20 May 2026, 9am
Meetings in autumn 2026
- 13 August 2026, 9am
- 8 September 2026, 9am
- 6 October 2026, 9am
- 3 November 2026, 9am
- 1 December 2026, 9am
- 17 December 2026, 9am
Further information
The assessment principles are described in the Degree Regulations.
The assessment of theses is described in the Participatory Research-based Development Handbook.
